🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.