🔗 Share this article

Getty Images

The US President recently executed an executive order vowing to use all measures - including the American armed forces - to secure the Gulf state of Qatar.

The document states that Washington will regard any military assault on the small resource-abundant nation as a risk to the United States itself and will "employ every legal and suitable action - including statecraft, monetary, and as needed, defense - to defend the priorities of the US and of the State of Qatar and to reestablish peace and stability".

The decree constitutes an extraordinary defense agreement between America and a significant Gulf cooperation council member, largely reflecting aspects of a Nato alliance. It will be the envy of its nearby states.

It's even more remarkable taking into account how Qatar has evolved in just a few years from being the target of an financial and political embargo by its neighbors to now becoming the area's mediation center - most recently in its capacity as arbitrator between the Israeli government and Hamas.

The Gaza-based group has its diplomatic bureaus in the Qatari capital and is currently assessing Trump's detailed conflict resolution initiative unveiled at the American executive mansion on at the beginning of the week. The Qatari capital is also home to the Middle East's largest US airbase, the strategic airbase.

The President's action to formalize United States security for Qatar is subsequent to the fury demonstrated by the ruling Al Thani family in recent weeks after aerial bombardments on their land struck group commanders, causing several subordinate figures of the faction deceased along with a local protection officer.

Qatar was also targeted by Tehran previously in reprisal for American strikes against its uranium enrichment plants.

The state is at the heart of growing concern among Gulf Arab states that cooperating with the America and accommodating its armed forces installations is not giving them the security they had presumed.

CCTV captures moment of military strike on Hamas leaders in the Qatari capital

Qatar's foreign ministry enthusiastically accepted the security decree saying it constituted "a significant move in reinforcing the two countries' tight military alliance".

But Trump's move poses major concerns over its scheduling and purpose, and it is expected to be challenged in America's political center.

It lays down a marker affecting the unstable and explosive regional dynamics just as the Palestinian group examines the President's plan for the future of Gaza.

Ex- American diplomat to Israel an experienced negotiator suggested the President was awarding Qatar an extraordinary prize before seeming to get commitments from Doha in exchange.

"This protection agreement to Qatar seems unreasonable unless they deliver a yes from Hamas, or remove them if they decline," commented Shapiro.

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz encapsulated what is likely to be the perception in the Jewish nation: "The President provided protection to Palestinian officials when living in Qatar, despite the Prime Minister's admonition that they would not be protected wherever they go."

But Middle East experts say the President's assurance is vital to stabilize a anxious area, disturbed by the Israeli government's increasing use of force internationally coupled with broader concerns about the reliability of the United States defense guarantee in the Gulf.

An expert commentator from the Eurasia Group remarked the President's action went "some way" to comfort Qatar and additional Gulf allies, stating that he expected Riyadh to request a similar commitment. "In my opinion it's significantly in the US interest to ensure their cooperation," the expert told media outlets.

The extent of the protection commitment for Qatar is wide-ranging, extending to US military backing in the event it is assaulted. In that regard it is reminiscent of the alliance's collective defense clause mandating a unified action for an hostile action against any single participant.

But being promulgated as an presidential directive from the American government, it avoids Congress, which under the War Powers Act should be advised by the commander-in-chief before deploying United States military.

That indicates the order might not possess legal force and could possibly be modified or discarded under a different leadership. It is also expected to face examination from opposition party members in the legislature.

The action is also being opposed by sections of Trump's own political followers who see it as in conflict with his "national priority" program.

Laura Loomer, an prominent nationalist campaigner associated with the President, proposed Qatar was potentially risky than friend to the US.

The Trump-loyalist radio host Mark Levin remarked the decree upended the US's traditional alliances in the area, questioning: "In case the leadership of the Palestinian group in Qatar is eliminated by Israel, are we going to war with the Jewish nation?"

Then there is the question of the President's relatives' individual and financial ties to Qatar, which his critics claim constitute a ethical concern in his diplomatic engagements with the extremely rich Gulf state.

The family business, managed by his sons the President's heirs, struck a deal in {April|spring|